New Jersey passes a “one gun a month” law, and says it is “aimed at improving [the] quality of life.“ As a side note, even the criminals are saying the best way to cut down or crime is to buy a gun. Whose quality of life will be improved by this law?
The kicker about the new law is a quote from Bryan Miller. “By limiting individuals to the purchase of no more than one handgun in 30 days, you dramatically reduce the ability of traffickers to make a profit.”
Okay, so limiting law-abiding citizens to one gun a month will reduce the amount of money that illegal arms merchants make? Or will it have the exact opposite effect, since with lower supply and continued demand, price will increase? Never let it be said that anti-gun advocates are logical.
(Articles courtesy of Sebastian and Dr. Lott)
